‘We have to make sure at Apple that we stay true, to focus, to laser focus. We can only do great things a few times. Only on a few products.’ – Tim Cook.
Ever since it’s introduction in 2002, its seen redesigns, introductions of podcasts and the App Store, and the iCloud service of ‘iTunes Match’.
But it’s become incredibly bloated. So much so, the iTunes name makes little sense for the app now.
Back in 2003, iTunes for Windows was made available, giving Apple the bigger market for its iPod and iTunes Music Store, which made it the most successful service for music. But in recent times, with the rise of streaming services and its lack of iTunes Radio in other markets, such as the UK, it’s seen to be lacking profusely.
But needing to have it ported to another OS such as Linux to help it succeed is a ridiculous concept now.
The devices are iTunes now, not the apps. It’s more of a service.
But iTunes Match needs work. Badly. I’ve subscribed simply because there’s not enough storage on my iPhone to have all my music on at once.
I’ve been visiting friends and family back in Lincoln for the past week, and while ripping a CD, having it available to all my devices is no less than total fustration.
Having to wait a whole day for it to simply show on my iPhone is ridiculous after adding it to iCloud on my Air, and there’s nothing more I can do than just closing the Music.app and hoping for the best.
Even though iOS 5 introduced ‘PC-Free’, having it all still stored in iTunes when syncing is a pain. There’s still complaints read of someone’s content being wiped when syncing it to iTunes after a long period of time.
If the App Store was separate to how the Mac variation is, that would be a great help. Or even if it was a web service, and you could install an app from there instead, similar to how Google and Windows Phone operates.
Spotify is a music service and nothing else. It’s focused on bringing the best experience to the customer in a streaming format, which means that it can be rolled out to many different devices, and not tied down to just one. It’s redesign of their apps have made it incredibly elegant on an iPhone/iPod Touch, with the iPad revamp screaming to be updated soon.
If the services were split, similar to how iOS does with ‘Podcasts’ and Videos, it would be a greater help.
This could be expanded as a ‘Control Panel’ to how it is on Windows, and it will still be easier to manage, as the Cloud would alleviate the confusion.
But then, a mere day into writing this, the news suddenly appeared with Apple in serious negotiations with Beats Music for a $3.5 Billion takeover.
It’s an interesting concept, and their biggest acquisition made since they bought NeXT for $400 million way back in 1997.
They wouldn’t gain many subscriptions compared to how many customers are on iTunes accounts, but the design of their app and the availability on more than one OS would be appealing.
There’s been so many opinions of this in under 12 hours, and a deal is rumoured to be announced in the next few days, but Apple won’t have just decided to buy them on a whim. Serious research into the benefits and risks would have been taken into consideration.
Hell, even Jimmy Lovine, the CEO of Beats, said he created the company inspired from Apple and iTunes, so for him to be an ‘adviser’ makes sense, and it could give iTunes the best shot in the arm its needed.
Go back to simplicity, make it about the music, nothing else.
Everything else will follow suit.